Friday, September 30, 2011

ART.265 CHAPTER 2 of the Code of the Philippines

       

                                                                                            
TOPIC: PROOF OF FILIATION OF LEGITIMATE CHILDREN


Art. 265. The filiation of legitimate children is proved by the record of birth appearing in the Civil Register, or by an authentic document or a final judgment.

DISCUSSION:

     The act of process of determining such relationship especially the son and the father or the adjudication of paternity is proved by the record of birth or documents in the civil register where it has a final judgment. Civil registration is the system by which a government records the vital events of its citizens and residents. The resulting repository or database is called civil register or registry, or population registry. The primary purpose of civil registration is to create legal documents that are used to establish and protect the civil rights of individuals. A secondary purpose is to create a data source for the compilation of vital statistics. In most countries, there is a legal requirement to notify the relevant authority of any life event which affects the registry.


           It is understood that the birth certificate that is the basic of the record of the birth is signed by the parents(normally the father) against whom against proof of filiation is directed. A recognition or admission by the father of a child that the latter is his child is a cogent evidence most especially if embodied in a final judgment. Be it noted that a record of birth or final judgment are public records or documents contents of which are prima facie presumed as correct. In fact, the stringent conditions needed by prove execution of private writings do not apply to public documents. Thus, public instruments are evidences even against a third person, of the fact of which gave rise to their execution and of the date of the latter.

ART.266 CHAPTER 2 of the Code of the Philippines

Topic: PROOF OF FILIATION OF LEGITIMATE CHILDREN

Art. 266. In the absence of the titles indicated in the preceding article, the filiation shall be proved by the continuous possession of status of a legitimate child.

DISCUSSION: 

 
It must be habitual for a considerable length of time. if the child uses the father's surname and he is treated publicly as a legitimate child by the father and mother and by the parents family, for several years, the child has a continuous possession of the status of a legitimate child. so also, if that child is supported and sent to school by the parents. "Continuous" does not mean that the possession of such status shall continue forever but only that it shall not be of an intermittent character while in continues. The possession of such status means that the father has treated the child as his own, directly and through others, spontaneously and without concealment though without publicity. There must be showing of permanent intention of the supposed father to consider the child as his own, continuous and clear manifestation of paternal affection and care. 


PICTURE OF PATERNITY
 

ART.267 CHAPTER 2 of the Code of the Philipines

Topic: PROOF OF FILIATION OF LEGITIMATE CHILDREN

Art.267. In the absence of a record of birth, authentic document, final judgment or possession of status, legitimate filiation may be proved by any other means allowed by the Rules of Court and special laws.


DISCUSSION:

 PICTURE OF COURT DOCUMENTS
 



The act or declaration of a person deceased or outside of the Philippines or unable to testify, in respect to the pedigree of another, person related to him by birth or marriage may be received in evidence where it occurred before the controversy and the relationship between the two person is shown by the evidence other than act or declaration. The word "pedigree" includes relationship, family, genealogy, birth, marriage, death, the dates when and the place where those facts occurred. And the names of the relatives. It embraces also the facts of family history intimately connected pedigree.

ART.268 CHAPTER 2 of the Code of the Philippines

TOPIC: PROOF OF FILIATION OF LEGITIMATE CHILDREN

Art. 268. The action to claim his legitimacy may be brought by the child during all his lifetime, and shall be transmitted to his heirs if he should die during his minority or in a state of insanity. In these cases the heirs shall have a period of five years within which to institute the action.

DISCUSSION:

During his or her lifetime, a child whether of age or not may claim and bring an action to claim legitimacy against the parents. But, how about if the parents are die? it seems clear that the child can still claim succession rights by proving hi filiation in the appropriate proceedings. The 5 year prescriptive period applies when the action to claim legitimacy is brought by the heirs. If the mother or father died during the minority of the child, in which case the latter may file the action before the expiration of four years from the attainment of his majority. If after the death of the father or of the mother a document should appear of which nothing had been heard and which either or both parents recognize the child. In this case, the action must be commenced within four years from discovery of the document. The rationale for the rule is to give the alleged parents opportunity to be heard. The reason for the exceptions is to protect the heirs. The action to claim the legitimacy may be brought by the child during his or her lifetime and shall be transmitted to the heirs should be the child die during the minority or a state of insanity. in this case, the heirs shall have a period of five (5) years within which to institute the action. The action commenced by the child shall survive notwithstanding the death of either or both of the parties. The child can bring the action during his or her entire lifetime and even after the death of the parents. In other words, the action does not prescribe as long as he lives.






ART.269 CHAPTER 3 of the Code of the Philippines

TOPIC: LEGITIMATED CHILDREN

Art. 269.   Only natural children can be legitimated. Children born outside wedlock of parents who, at the time of the conception of the former, were not disqualified by any impediment to marry each other, are natural.

DISCUSSION: 

   
             

                In effect only natural children, without need o recognition can be legitimated. The provision, which originated from the law of Toro. requiring recognition of the child in legitimation did not ind logical support. It is more logical to conclude that the marriage of the parents of the child is an indubitable demonstration o their recognition of such child as their own, assuming that there is compliance with the basic requisite that such child was conceived at the time when the parents did not suffer any impediment from marrying each other.



ART.270 CHAPTER 3 of the Code of the Philippines

TOPIC: LEGITIMATED CHILDREN

 Art. 270. Legitimation shall take place by the subsequent marriage between the parents

DISCUSSION: 


             

                It is the subsequent valid marriage between the parents of the natural child or children that is the operative act of legitimation. The annulment if this marriage which maybe violable (valid until set a side by a competent court) will not destroy the legitimation o the child or children which by the operative act o marriage, had already taken affect.